Introduction

Project description
Peckforton Castle Hotel is a prestigious Grade 1 listed building; however the Bell Tower and West wing remained in its original condition for many years but was due to be refurbished to create additional hotel accommodation.
Ecologist’s name and contact details
Stan Irwin - Tyrer Partnership
Planning authority
Cheshire East
Brief site description
Castle Hotel

Pre-works roost structure

Type of structure
Building
Use
Commercial Unit
Condition
In Use
Approx. age
160 years
Main construction material of walls
Stone
Roof design
Pitched Roof
Roof material
Clay Tiled
Internal roof structure
Timber Frame
Lighting present on site and its proximity to the roost
Not reported.
Photos or annotated figures of roost structure

Pre-works roost description

Species
Natterer’s bat
Number of bats max count
81
Type of roost
Maternity Roost
Evidence of bats
Bats Recorded Emerging/Re-entering
Roost location
Other
Aspect of roost
SW
Height of roost entrance (m)
10
Roost material(s)
  • brickwork
Nearest commuting feature
Woodland
Distance to nearest commuting feature (m)
Not reported
Photos or annotated figures of roost

Proposed works

Description of works
To facilitate new guest accommodation, the existing roosts were retained but the light-sampling area reduced in height.
Type of impact upon the roost
Long-Term Roost Modification and Roost Loss

Proposed mitigations

Type of mitigation
Mitigation
Specific technical detail of measure
Creation of void above the guest room and adapt the exit/entry route. A ceiling was constructed, which retained the existing roosts and most notably the two barrel arches within which the bats were using for pre-emergence flight were also retained. The window at which bats exited/entered was modified to a reduced size (300mm high x 400mm wide) and was designed at a downwards angle to
facilitate a natural downward exit to nearby woodland and an upwards angle to allow a natural flight line into the created void above the room.
Relevant annotated figures
Roost location
Other
Aspect of roost
SW
Height of roost entrance (m)
10
Roost material(s)
Nearest commuting feature
Woodland
Distance to nearest commuting feature (m)
Not reported
Photos or annotated figures of roost

Actual mitigations implemented

Type of mitigation
Mitigation
Specific technical detail of measure
Creation of void above the guest room and adapt the exit/entry route. A ceiling was constructed, which retained the existing roosts and most notably the two barrel arches within which the bats were using for pre-emergence flight were also retained. The window at which bats exited/entered was modified to a reduced size (300mm high x 400mm wide) and was designed at a downwards angle to
facilitate a natural downward exit to nearby woodland and an upwards angle to allow a natural flight line into the created void above the room.
Relevant annotated figures
Roost location
Other
Aspect of roost
SW
Height of roost entrance (m)
10
Roost material(s)
Nearest commuting feature
Woodland
Distance to nearest commuting feature (m)
Not reported
Photos or annotated figures of roost

Monitoring data

Length of monitoring proposed
1 year
Frequency of monitoring
one a month between June to August 2013
Type of monitoring
Dusk and Dawn Survey
Date and time
6th June 2013
Evidence recorded
Total of 57 bats emerged following pre-flight activity within the void
Interventions made
None
Type of monitoring
Roost Inspection
Date and time
11th July 2013
Evidence recorded
No emergence or bat activity
Interventions made
None
Type of monitoring
Roost Inspection
Date and time
14th August 2013
Evidence recorded
Total of 42 bats emerged following pre-flight activity within the void
Interventions made
None

Final details

Lessons learned
Cooperation with owners, understanding their requirements & concerns and full gathering of data associated with the roost before applying for a licence.