Introduction

Project description
Refurbishment of stately home and change of use to a 5 star spa hotel. Such refurbishment resulted in the loss of hibernation space for daubenton's and brown long-eared bats in the buildings, including cellar rooms. A new 'bat cave' was constructed as compensation.
Ecologist’s name and contact details
Lloyd Bore Ecology
Planning authority
South Bedfordshire District Council
Brief site description
Luton Hoo Stately Home comprises a number of buildings/structures, usually large in scale within parkland. It is situated close to agricultural land and urban fringe, with a lake complex within 1km..

Pre-works roost structure

Type of structure
Building
Use
Other
Condition
In Use
Approx. age
Original build 1774, major refurbishment in 1848
Main construction material of walls
Stone
Roof design
Pitched Roof
Roof material
Slate
Internal roof structure
Timber Frame
Photos or annotated figures of roost structure

Pre-works roost description

Species
Brown long-eared bat
Number of bats max count
50
Type of roost
Hibernation Roost
Evidence of bats
Bats Seen in Roost
Roost location
Underground Structure
Aspect of roost
Not Applicable
Height of roost entrance (m)
Ground level
Roost material(s)
  • Stone
Nearest commuting feature
Hedge
Distance to nearest commuting feature (m)
Not reported

Proposed works

Description of works
Large-scale refurbishment of stately home. This case study concentrates on the creation of the successful bat hibernation cave as compensation for loss of underground tunnels and cellar rooms. Although other bat roosts were identified elsewhere, non-hibernation roosts were either wholly avoided or mitigated by careful timing of works.
Type of impact upon the roost
Long-Term Roost Modification and Roost Loss

Proposed mitigations

Type of mitigation
Compensation
Specific technical detail of measure
Bat cave / hibernaculum constructed in woodland behind the main house.
Size: 15 x 1.8 x 1.8m
Materials: Brick, breeze block, concrete and earth with timber crevice additions
Additional info: The bat cave was carefully designed to provide even humidity and temperature conditions with suitable crevices for several hibernating bat species.
Estimated cost of mitigation construction (optional): £25,000+
Relevant annotated figures
Roost location
Underground Structure
Aspect of roost
N
Height of roost entrance (m)
Ground level
Roost material(s)
  • Other
Nearest commuting feature
Woodland
Distance to nearest commuting feature (m)
Not reported
Photos or annotated figures of roost

Actual mitigations implemented

Type of mitigation
Compensation
Specific technical detail of measure
Bat cave / hibernaculum constructed in woodland behind the main house.
Size: 15 x 1.8 x 1.8m
Materials: Brick, breeze block, concrete and earth with timber crevice additions
Additional info: The bat cave was carefully designed to provide even humidity and temperature conditions with suitable crevices for several hibernating bat species.
Estimated cost of mitigation construction (optional): £25,000+
Relevant annotated figures
Roost location
Other
Aspect of roost
N
Height of roost entrance (m)
Ground level
Roost material(s)
  • Brickwork
Nearest commuting feature
Woodland
Distance to nearest commuting feature (m)
Not reported
Internal temperature and humidity of roost
5.4
External temperature and humidity of roost
4.9
Photos or annotated figures of roost

Monitoring data

Length of monitoring proposed
From 18 months after construction in 2010. Monitoring ongoing.
Frequency of monitoring
Annual monitoring every autumn and winter by Bedfordshire Bat Group.
Type of monitoring
Roost Inspection
Date and time
15th September 2010
Evidence recorded
Bats (Daubenton's Natterer's and brown long-eared) were found using the cave in the first winter of monitoring. Swarming has been observed at the mouth of cave in autumn 2010 and 2011. This is the first confirmed autumn swarming site in Bedfordshire, which considering the hibernation site has only been in place for around 4 years is an important discovery. Four male Natterer's bats were caught during swarming at the entrance in 2010 and a brown long-eared bat was caught during swarming in 2011 when other species were noted but not caught.

Bats first appeared to be using the structure within the first 12 months. First observations of bats using the site were made 18 months after completion.
Interventions made
None reported.

Final details

Lessons learned
Monitoring during the first winter after completion would have allowed us to determine which bats first used the hibernation cave. Presumably increasing the size of the cave or creating further caves would create more bat habitat but the cave and bat boxes are considered to have mitigated for the roosting areas lost.

Monitoring is essential to determine success of mitigation and should commence during the first winter from construction. Careful choice of design and materials is essential.